The Future of Music Creation in the Age of AI

By Yin Nwe Ko


In A world where technol­ogy continues to push the boundaries of creativity, the realm of music composition and production stands at the preci­pice of a remarkable transfor­mation. Imagine a future where machines not only assist but actively collaborate with musi­cians, pushing the boundaries of musical expression beyond anything we’ve ever witnessed. As we delve into the exciting pos­sibilities that one of the currently popular technologies called AI brings to the world of music, we uncover a symphony of innova­tion, creativity, and the tantaliz­ing promise of an entirely new era in musical artistry. Welcome to the future of music creation in the age of AI, where the harmo­nious fusion of man and machine awaits exploration.


AI, short for Artificial Intel­ligence, is a computer simula­tion of human intelligence. As Phil Tee, CEO of AIOps com­pany Moogsoft highlights, we already use it in our daily lives. “You have AI on every device you own, from your Apple watch to your smartphone.”


Truth is, for many years, the music industry has put AI to use. Ever asked a smart speaker to play a song? Or ever streamed Spotify’s new DJ AI, which plays music catered to your exact taste? This is AI at work.


So maybe Terminator II was catastrophizing AI in true Hol­lywood fashion. Tee continues: “The truth is very mundane. It has absolutely no self-awareness or intent, it’s no more malicious than the car in your garage. And, at the end of the day, every com­puter has an off switch!”


Technology drives musical innovation

So, in the words of an AI expert, there’s nothing to fear just yet. What’s more, we need to remember that technology in music is nothing new. In fact, the past has looked kindly at the early innovators.


Born out of Birmingham in 1963, the Mellotron was one of the first mass-produced sampled keyboards. The Beatles adopted the revolutionary sound in no time. A mere four years later, in 1967, the whimsical, dreamy tones were prominent on “Straw­berry Fields Forever”, a song that helped to spearhead a psy­chedelic movement.


Talking of The Beatles, mu­sic writer Rob Bowman said “One of the two most influential bands in the history of postwar popular music” alongside the Fab Four was Kraftwerk — a band who embraced a full elec­tric soundscape, changing the course of pop music forever.


Multi-platinum-selling mu­sic Producer TommyD is open to AI and believes it’s the next step in the ongoing relationship between tech and music. “Elec­tric guitars have been on sale for nearly 100 years, but not every­one is Jimi Hendrix. When the hard disk recording came in, I told all my engineer mates to buy systems or get left behind. Those who did are still in the business, those that didn’t are selling insurance. Learn to use the tech or get left behind,” he states.


AI to the rescue

Is it high time for musicians to consider the benefits of AI? Above all, the latest tech boom could offer a helping hand for time-consuming tasks. There’s so much more than music-mak­ing needed to get your name heard. Crafting social media con­tent to keep an online persona is a job in its own right — not forgetting the creation of music videos, artwork, and gig posters thrown onto the to-do list.


With streaming royalty rates too low to supply vital funds, the money isn’t available to out­source the workload. Perhaps it’s time to lean on AI to help. Truth is, AI can complete these tasks in seconds. This should appeal to musicians who can then concen­trate on what’s most important: the music.


When probed on the use of AI in music, Tee cited plagia­rism as a key area. “ChatGPT is already very good at spotting when two pieces of text are the same or from the same author and it is a short step to do the same in music.”


Songwriters are no strangers to lawsuits. Even one of the world’s most streamed artists, Taylor Swift, found her­self embroiled in a dispute over lyrics at the turn of the year. Writ­ers Sean Hall and Nate Butler brought the case to the court having written the 3LW song “Playas Gon’ Play” containing the lyrics “Playas, they gonna’ play And haters, they gonna hate.” Sound familiar?


Swift denied lifting lyrics for her smash hit “Shake It Off ”. That could well be the case. It’s impossible for a songwriter to know the lyrics of every song ever written. With that in mind, there’s a chance of imitating phrases unknowingly when scribbling ideas in the studio. A plagiarism-detecting tool could become a vital part of a song­writer’s arsenal. It would make sure new tracks are original, plus prevent legal fees and stress from future lawsuits. If the tool could alert plagiarized melodies, songwriters would embrace AI.


Overstepping the lines?

Speaking of lyrics, they’re resistant to generative AI, right? Well, it turns out not. AI can write lyrics. We prompted ChatGPT to “write me song lyrics about lost love in the style of Leonard Cohen.”


Reams of original lyrics rolled down the screen in a mat­ter of seconds. Verses, choruses, an outro, the whole nine yards. Evidently, AI can write lyrics. Moreover, write lyrics in a sim­ilar vein to one of the world’s favourite songwriters. Here’s a sample of the results…


“I met her in the autumn

With leaves of gold and red

Her eyes were like the ocean

Her hair, a crown on her head

I try to fill the void

With cheap whiskey and cig­arettes

But nothing can replace

The love I can’t forget”


Songwriters use words to re­lease their own emotions. When heartbroken, they’ll write about their vulnerabilities and pain. Once on record or played live, it’s an insightful glimpse into their soul. The listener who shares the same sentiments takes sol­ace, and that’s one of the many beauties of music.


The purity of human connection. But if AI writes the lyrics, then surely that’s at risk. Furthermore, as AI becomes wiser, it’ll become harder to distinguish words that come from human emotion or not.


It’s a concern that resonates with Leon Luis, owner of Altar­Boy Music Publishing. “It’s a loss of humanity. Songwriting is spiritual. You put pen to paper and write what the world tells you. You need heartbreak before you can write a song about lost love. You can’t substitute human experience with code.”


The rise of the deep fake

Artificial lyrics are the tip of the iceberg. In February this year, The (Not So) Real Slim Shady featured on a song with DJ David Guetta in front of thousands of ravers. As punters danced and rejoiced at hearing the new collaboration, most were unaware it wasn’t Eminem at all.


Having asked AI to write a verse in the style of Eminem, Guetta then put those lyrics into another generative AI program to recreate the voice. The re­sult was a close likeness, indis­tinguishable to most. Now, the floodgates are open and AI can rap and sing in the style of your favourite artists.


Later, an AI duet featuring Drake and The Weeknd landed on streaming platforms. It soon went viral, rattling the music in­dustry at the same time. Drake, the golden goose of the Universal record label, had been cloned. Universal responded by ban­ishing the song off Spotify and others. A statement by the label called the song “a breach of our agreements and a violation of copyright law”.


It’s not only the digitized pop genre that has fallen victim to AI deep fakery. A set of songs by AIsis, an AI Oasis, complete with fake Liam Gallagher, took the internet by storm in late April. It poses an enormous question about copyright. Luis, who deals with music law, had this to say: “With AI, we’re in completely uncharted territory. We’re talk­ing Wild West. Like Arizona in the 1880s during the Gold Rush.”


AI has stepped into murky, dangerous waters. It’s safe to say, that Universal has nailed its colours to its mast when it comes to AI deep fakes. Their statement continued with defiant wording. “Which side of history [do] all stakeholders in the music ecosystem want to be on? The side of artists, fans, and human creative expression, or on the side of deep fakes, fraud, and denying artists their due com­pensation?”.


The death of the songwriter?

When doomsday merchants warned of an AI influx, we thought the creatives would be the last to fall. But the warning signs are there. The sophisti­cated nature of modern AI has the potential to take the job of songwriters.


Yet, as it stands, even AI has its limitations. Phil Tee con­cludes, “For all the hype sur­rounding ChatGPT and AI, what it is incapable of is novelty. Hav­ing the sum total of all knowledge and an excellent pattern repe­tition algorithm just condemns you to repeat the past. We may have a more efficient production process for music … but making the next Bob Dylan or predicting the ‘Whispering Grass’ hit is a long stretch.”


With no law to abide by, the next few months will determine the future of AI in music. Ques­tions loom over the intellectu­al property of AI-written lyrics while, for all intents and purpos­es, deep fake AI tracks appear to be on the wrong side of the law.


Moves are being made to protect the songwriter. The Hu­man Artistry Campaign is a pe­tition calling for the responsible use of AI in music. It has the support of powerful organiza­tions in music and sets out seven principles where AI and human creativity can live side by side. Because, let’s face it, while AI has its place in the music indus­try, in the wrong hands, it can do damage.


I guess we need to hear from one more “person” in this conversation. Over to you ChatGPT…


“No, AI will not destroy mu­sic making. While AI technology has advanced significantly in re­cent years, it is still not capable of replicating the full range of human creativity.”


Maybe it’s not quite “hasta la vista” for the songwriter after all.


In brief, the future of mu­sic creation in the age of AI is undoubtedly a fascinating and evolving landscape. While AI brings unprecedented tools to assist musicians and streamline certain aspects of the creative process, it also raises complex questions about creativity, au­thenticity, and the role of the human artist. As we navigate this uncharted territory, it’s clear that AI won’t spell the end of music making but rather chal­lenge us to define the bounda­ries between man and machine, reminding us that the heart and soul of music will forever remain uniquely human. So, as we con­tinue to harness the power of AI to unlock new musical possibil­ities, let’s ensure that we do so responsibly, preserving the mag­ic of genuine human expression in every note, lyric, and melody we create. The future may be AI-enhanced, but the heartbeat of music will always belong to us, the creators and dreamers.


Reference: Reader’s Digest July 2023